The teaching method is the third important factor that influences children's scientific literacy. Traditional way of teaching by forcing students to memorize forcing dead knowledge into the students' brains, but can't arouse students' interest in science and yearning, also can't let students learn to use this knowledge to solve their difficulties and problems. Facing an increasingly complex and rapidly changing future, education's biggest challenge is deciding what to learn and how to learn best. Now, through the problem oriented teaching and inquiry teaching to make the students active learning seems to have become a trend of the reform of teaching methods, but how to through good questions to stimulate students' learning interests and potential, fake hermes belt and how to design a good research project to help students learn to analyze problems and the team cooperation, for global education institution is still a considerable problem.
In March 2016, Peking University examination institute and the MIT BLOSSOMS program held the BLOSSOMS and Louis Vuitton Belt teaching reform seminar at Peking University. At the meeting, professor Richard Larson, a professor of engineering systems at MIT, showed some of the exploration of the BLOSSOMS project in teaching style reform. By such as how mosquitoes flying in the rain, ice melting faster than salt water in fresh water? such questions to help students think and learn like scientists, gave participants a great inspiration. Design the curriculum system, however, requires more of teaching enthusiasm and ability of teachers, also need to invest more resources, for the vast number of developed countries and regions in terms of education institutions still exist considerable difficulties and obstacles.
Today, when we talk about scientific literacy, we tend to fall into two pitfalls. We pay special attention to the mastery of scientific knowledge, but we often neglect it, which is more important than specific scientific knowledge, which is the true belief in science and the relentless pursuit of scientific spirit. The purpose of our study of science is not to solve the problems we encounter in the real world, but to cope with the exams and the higher education. We spent more than two decades getting a Ph.D. replica hermes belt in natural science, but in a flash of graduation, we were in an administrative position that had almost nothing to do with it; We recite a lot of scientific jargon, popping up two English words every now and then, just to make it easy to talk to someone without appearing too ignorant. In the process of learning scientific knowledge, we seldom get real scientific thinking training, let alone to what extent to improve the understanding of science. My observations do not match the results of the data survey.
In the eighth of Louis Vuitton Belt association for science and technology of Hermes Belt citizens scientific literacy survey, 2010 Hermes Belt citizens of basic scientific literacy rate of 3.27%, among them, the necessary scientific knowledge to 14.67% of citizens, to master the basic scientific methods to 9.75% of citizens, advocate scientific spirit to 64.94% of citizens. On the face of it, the proportion of citizens advocating scientific spirit seems not low. However, it is one thing to advocate scientific spirit in speech, and practicing the scientific spirit in practice is another thing. In the classroom, in the unit, in public opinion, exactly how many people can have the idea of independence and freedom? How many people are able to express themselves in a way that doesn't go with the flow? In particular, in the face of the pressure of the boss and the external temptation, how many people can insist on the pursuit of truth, without compromising, even though it is not a regret? More a few people can do as Mr Ma yinchu, in a frenzy of collective, during a siege, uttered this frame clashing of words: though nearly eighty years of age, I know perfectly well outnumbered, signed, single horse, come out to play, until die, never to designed to force brought Daniel convinced that critics to surrender.